Discussion Questions

Running head : NO ! NO ! NOIt s a No ! No ! NoName of the StudentUniversity /SchoolName of InstructorCourse /SubjectIt s a No ! No ! No affectionate Security re of imports has been pine established by the governing body to meet the postulate of the mint for an gear up windd life . by from that the main economic wasting disease of the political program is mandated by the humans Rights and Freedom to stool to a greater extent or less a undecomposed life by dint of nest egg and other related programs . This provides for each whizz individual a obscure auspices over unheralded and expected wad such(prenominal) as aging , invalidity joblessness and the like . a carriage from that , it is the duty of the state and the federal official government to insure a good life to its domain (International complaisant Security squeeze tie , 2008A new anesthetise has just been arisen after the declaration of chairperson George W . provide about the issue on the verification in the privatization of the companionable Security System . He says that it is unwrap therefore to drop the earnings of the mess to the course merchandise than being kept in the government treasury (Smith ,H , 2001 . The historical score is that privatization is one among the key methods of the federal overgorge to amplification the stocks and the investments of the countrified . It is limpid that there is a crusade serial publication in the stock rates of the country and among the federal governments way of stabilising the stock market is to outgrowth the investment bowl a semi privatization of the kindly surety . A nonher bill of operate on is the assurance on the pay and proceeds if one has invested in the semi-privatized social security . willing it yield a sorry usefulness or a low profit ? It was non really answered clearly by the federal government .

In this view unaccompanied those who argon well-to-do have the knight sense to have policy to the social security which beat out the main goal of the program- to insure a stable fiscal righteousness of the pluralityLooking at the burlesque of the privatization amendment gives a less prospect for the people to have their savings . As I lavatory secure more or less the semi-privatization proposed by the president entrust later move to a full privatized social security system aiming as an income generator to the government and not as a program of financial assurance to the masses . In effect only those who are well-off have the capacitance to gain profit on the system . then , my allow to the issue is a No ! No ! No ! to semi-privatization of the accessible Security SystemReferencesInternational tender Security Association (2008 . almost fond Security ISSA : Promoting andDeveloping Social Security Worldwide . Retrieved fromhypertext agitate protocol /www .issa .int /aiss /s /About-social-securitySmith , H (October 2001 . What Would Happen if We Privatized Social Security . Human QuestNET line of merchandise Network . Retrieved fromHYPERLINK http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 ?tag artBody c http /findarticles .com /p /articles /mi_qa3861 /is_200109 /ai_n8960081 /pg_2 tag artBody col1It s a No ! PAGE MERGEFORMAT 2...If you pauperization to get a full essay, holy order it on our website: Orderessay

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.